Obama the Indoctrinator

This talk about keeping kids home on Tuesday is just absurd. I’m seldom surprised anymore, but I am surprised about this. I’m still not back into the blogging game, so let me just make two points to those who are so appalled by the upcoming speech.

• Reagan and Bush 41 both made speeches to the nation’s schoolchildren, despite claims made by such mental giants as Rick Sanchez.
• Even if the speech is partisan, you are doing your children a disservice by downplaying their critical reasoning skills. You’re also not showing too much faith in your own ability to have reasonable discussions with your children–but then, you’re not seeming too bright at this point anyway.

I’m going to link to an article on Examiner.com. I normally wouldn’t use such a source, because even I find that it leans too heavily to the left. (Of course, I did just see an ad for Ann Coulter, so maybe I misjudged…) The article, however, is just filled with facts: provable, hard facts. Check it out

George C. Joseph and Other Things

By now, I’m sure  you’ve seen the letter from Mr. Joseph talking about how his dealership will be taken away. I don’t know the circumstances and will not claim that I do. What I will say is that I work for a family-owned car dealership as well, one that has about twice the number of employees and around four times the inventory. It’s not an entirely fair comparison since they sell foreign cars, but I’ve done some asking around and it turns out that what allegedly happened to Mr. Joseph couldn’t happen to my dealership, because the owner was a little more savvy with the contracts he signed. I also found this post on Craigslist, which while I definitely don’t agree with everything in it, I still find highly amusing:

link

Dear Mr. Joseph.

Congratulations on the success you and your family have enjoyed over the last 35 years.

As you know our free market oriented capitalist system is based on a few fundamental principles. Some of these are:
1. Individual risk and reward
2. Personal responsibility
3. Market selection of winners and losers
4. Rule of law and integrity of contracts

Part of what makes our system so great, is that it enables hardworking citizens, like yourself to achieve great success, as you have. Another part of what makes our system so great, is that it disciplines, through failure, those who will not adapt to new realities, and those who refuse to prepare themselves for all contingencies that life might throw their way.

I applaud you for accepting the first part of the above, but question why you don’t appreciate the second. Your family risked much over the last 35 years. For a large portion of that time, you succeeded. Now you have failed. Did you write a letter to the editor when you succeeded saying “how in America could I be so successful?” Of course not.

During the time you were succeeding, millions of Americans took large gambles and started small businesses. In many case they lost everything – and had to start over… perhaps even working as a salesman or mechanic in your shop. Did you then question the system which had not treated them as kindly as you? Did you then express your outrage that they did not succeed – as you had? Of course not.

You claim that you will lose everything through “NO FAULT OF OUR OWN”. Is that true?

Why did you not see an upcoming recession? Why did you not save money more prudently – in the event of a downturn? Why did not diversify into other brands? Why did you not demand some guarantee from Chrysler when they demanded you remodel your store?

You had a continuing relationship with Chrysler of your own choice, they did not turn out to be the best partner… That happens, and will continue to happen in our system. Next time, you and/or your offspring will remember a simple lesson: “chose your partners carefully”.

Chrysler failed. That is unfortunate, but due to many structural problems with their business model. Don’t despair! American’s will continue to need cars, and new, smarter, more nimble competitors will fill that need. Perhaps you can start again selling their cars, or working for someone who sells their cars. Yes, you might not be boss anymore, and yes, you might not have the prestige that comes with employing 50 people.

However, none of that is your right, and nobody else owes that to you.

Your only right, is to rise and fall as the forces of fortune and your personal enterprise allow. Nothing more. Our rule of law dictates that under bankruptcy all contracts are renegotiable. Perhaps before starting your next venture you brush up your understanding of our legal system. All contracts are subject to review and summary cancellation by the presiding judge in the event that a counterparty goes into bankruptcy. Bankruptcy was, unfortunately necessary for Chrysler to prune you and other underperforming dealerships because state car dealership laws frequently make it impossible for a car manufacturer to cut dealerships without bankruptcy (I’m quite confident you did not fight these laws.)

My advice: Keep your chin up. Maintain your principles. Believe in hard work. Stop crying like a child who has lost at checkers.

Most sincere regards,
Uncle Sam

I would also love to know if his income decreased any in order to try to avoid firing the 20 people he did. He’s certainly not obligated to do that, but if he didn’t, then he needn’t ask that the government be concerned for their plight, either.

***********************

Nancy Pelosi, I wish you would just once think before you speak. You’d think after the first time you got caught in a lie you’d learn, but for such an intelligent woman, this lesson seems to remain beyond you. You’re making a ridiculous spectacle of yourself, and you need to knock that shit off.

***********************

Prince’s latest website: lotusflow3r.com Go there. He is the ultimate and timeless badass–even if I don’t have $77 to join his fanclub.

My Opinions: The Speed Dating Version. Also With More Cursing!

I’m writing this at work, but will post at home where WordPress isn’t blocked. Since I’m at work, I’m crankier than usual (if you can imagine). And kind of mean. And very long-winded. Just a warning.

***********************

I don’t care about Miss California’s views on gay marriage. She has the absolute right to her views, and the right to express them publicly if given that platform. I find her irritating for other reasons. First, she talks like a barely-coherent, 15-year-old valley girl. Like, you know? (“My country”? “I think I believe”? Really?) A big part of being a representative of anything is to be able to communicate well, and she does not. Surprisingly, this doesn’t seem to bother many people. Of course, many people abuse apostrophes and aren’t even smart enough to take advantage of spellcheck, so maybe the value of any form of communication–other than big fake boobs and generic Christian terminology–is declining.

I find the fake boobs irritating. I don’t mind that they’re fake (much) and I don’t care who paid for them; I mind that they look fake. Seriously, you could drive a semi in the space between those things. Either cough up for something more realistic looking, or just let it go.

Finally, and mostly, I am aggravated by the total hypocrisy that is becoming so normal for many of those who claim to be Christians. God doesn’t mind you being topless, but hell awaits two consenting adults who want to spend their lives together? And this bullshit about how she’s a model and was looking for lingerie modeling work and sometimes models wear lingerie just annoys the hell out of me. The Bible says women should dress modestly. Do you get a pass because you’re a model? How stupid do you think Americans are? Oh, wait…it’s working for you. That’s not scary at all. Also, email has proven that you lied about when the pictures were taken. But who cares about lies? You’re pretty and blond and you’re working for Jesus by combating the gay. Free pass to Heaven, folks.

She should be removed for the pictures, period. She would not be the first, and as none of the others were being persecuted for being Biblically Correct, it wouldn’t have been the case for her either. I’m not remotely surprised by Trump’s decision to keep her, though. He has evidenced in the past his soft spot for manipulative blonds with big boobs.

***********************

“My uncle’s cousin’s neighbor’s dog has been to Iraq, and he doesn’t have a problem with waterboarding (or other EITs).” Really? Well, perhaps you should discuss it with John McCain, who seems to think it’s torturous, not to mention unethical, immoral, and causes more harm than good. Of course, he was only a POW for five years, so his opinions should totally be taken with a grain of salt. And Dick Cheney says…

***********************

Why the hell are we still being subjected to Dick Cheney’s insane rantings? Have you noticed how silent Bush is being about everything? Have you noticed that the one thing he has said is that he won’t criticize President Obama because Obama “deserves my silence”? That’s classy. I’d advise Cheney to take note, but he has made it abundantly clear for the past eight years that class is utterly beyond him. The world makes fun of Bush for being an uncouth cowboy, but he’s a prince compared to Cheney.

***********************

Speaking of waterboarding, when is Sean Hannity going to let Keith Olbermann put his money where Sean’s mouth is? (And if he could put his fist where Sean’s mouth is, I wouldn’t call it a bad thing. Don’t ever let anyone tell you liberals hate all violence.) Olbermann better be planning to donate to charity on his own, because I have my doubts Hannity is going to man up.

***********************

An Open Letter to President Obama:

Timothy Geithner. Really? After the whole Daschle debacle, you thought Timothy Geithner was the way to go? Interesting.

Otherwise, man, I’m proud of you. You’re still all kinds of awesome, just like I expected when I voted for you. I appreciate you doing so much that you said you’d do, and doing it quickly–and I know this is only the beginning. Thank you.

Timothy Geithner? Really? OK, sorry.

Sincerely,

JustThisGirl

PS I mean no disrespect, truly, but you and your wife are undoubtedly the hottest First Couple in the history of this great nation. John and Jackie were hard to beat, but by god, you did it.

***********************

Why is it “we” when Navy SEALs save a ship from pirates, but “I didn’t know about this” when planes fly over NY for a photo shoot? I don’t know, let me think…maybe because nobody can know every single tiny thing that goes on, and while the President likely isn’t going to be informed about a photo shoot, he probably will be informed about pirates attacking a US ship. I’m sorry, let me reintroduce you. Conservative nitwits: logic. Logic: conservative nitwits. Besides, the man has already claimed more responsibility in five months than Bush did in two years. (He’s on track to beat former President Clinton, as well.) That said…

***********************

Who the HELL thought that photo shoot was a good idea? Seriously, how did SO MANY people hear/read about flying Air Force One in and around NYC landscape and think, “Oh, this is fine, nothing wrong here”? I know an entire governmental department that should be given thorough mental health evaluations. About the only thing I’ve ever heard that’s dumber than this is a woman who filed a complaint against a gynecologist because he asked her to remove her pants for a pelvic exam. These people are wandering around unfettered, but I have to spend hundreds of dollars a month on medication. This seems unbalanced, somehow… (Get it? Unbalanced? See what I did there? :p)

***********************

Among the arguments that were given in favor of a complete face transplant for Connie Culp are that she wanted to be able to eat normally, breathe normally, and not be called names on the street. I cannot comprehend the level of douchiness that a person would have to embody not to support the transplant, but let’s pretend that there’s some basis for that opinion and ignore it for the time being. Let’s focus on that last thing: she didn’t want to be called names on the street.

As a person who has experienced that myself (although undoubtedly to a lesser degree than has Mrs. Culp), I just have one thing to say: What is wrong with people? I think that for people who are, say, seven or over (and not mentally challenged), pointing and laughing at someone for something like that should result in sniper fire from surrounding building tops. (Those snipers can also nab people who don’t return their carts in the parking lot. I weigh 8000 pounds and am so tired from an underactive thyroid that I can’t always even manage to take off my clothes at night, and even I return my cart to the corral.)

Also, have you read much about this face transplant? This woman is freaking amazing. If my husband shot me in the face at close range, I highly doubt I would be as gracious as she is. Also, I would probably shoot his genitals at close range. Different strokes.

***********************

Facebook, stop changing things. I’m seriously, dude.*

*This is a South Park quote; I didn’t suddenly lapse into Carrie Prejean–speak.

***********************

Elizabeth Edwards, how dare you write a book/not hold your husband accountable/blame the other woman/let him run for President knowing what you knew (even though you’d hardly had a chance to process it yourself before he made his announcement)? Those of us who have never been terminally ill with a cheating spouse while in the national eye are very disappointed in your behavior, and we are confident we could do better, even though it’s none of our goddamn business and we should either be supportive or shut the hell up.

***********************

I know I should be grateful that I have a job. And I am grateful for my paycheck, really. But I don’t know how much longer it will be before I snap. And even then, it might not be at work. Maybe it will be at my boyfriend’s mother. Maybe it will be at the next person in front of me at Wal-Mart or Kroger who is rude to the cashier. Maybe it will be at the bra digging into my skin even as I type. Who knows what the future holds?

***********************

Random funny exchange:

Me: I don’t get this hoopla over Michelle’s sleeveless top in her first White House photos. Jackie O wore sleeveless for hers, too.

Kristi: Yes, JustThisGirl, but her arms were white.

And I fell silent, because how are you gonna argue with that logic?

Texas Lawmaker Suggests Asians Adopt Easier Names

I’m just posting the article and the link. I don’t think I need to comment.

Lawmaker defends comment on Asians

Call for voters to simplify their names not racially motivated, Terrell Republican says

By R.G. RATCLIFFE
Copyright 2009 Houston Chronicle

April 9, 2009, 11:58AM

AUSTIN — A North Texas legislator during House testimony on voter identification legislation said Asian-descent voters should adopt names that are “easier for Americans to deal with.”

The comments caused the Texas Democratic Party on Wednesday to demand an apology from state Rep. Betty Brown, R-Terrell. But a spokesman for Brown said her comments were only an attempt to overcome problems with identifying Asian names for voting purposes.

The exchange occurred late Tuesday as the House Elections Committee heard testimony from Ramey Ko, a representative of the Organization of Chinese Americans.

Ko told the committee that people of Chinese, Japanese and Korean descent often have problems voting and other forms of identification because they may have a legal transliterated name and then a common English name that is used on their driver’s license on school registrations.

Easier for voting?

Brown suggested that Asian-Americans should find a way to make their names more accessible.

“Rather than everyone here having to learn Chinese — I understand it’s a rather difficult language — do you think that it would behoove you and your citizens to adopt a name that we could deal with more readily here?” Brown said.

Brown later told Ko: “Can’t you see that this is something that would make it a lot easier for you and the people who are poll workers if you could adopt a name just for identification purposes that’s easier for Americans to deal with?”

Democratic Chairman Boyd Richie said Republicans are trying to suppress votes with a partisan identification bill and said Brown “is adding insult to injury with her disrespectful comments.”

Brown spokesman Jordan Berry said Brown was not making a racially motivated comment but was trying to resolve an identification problem.

Berry said Democrats are trying to blow Brown’s comments out of proportion because polls show most voters support requiring identification for voting. Berry said the Democrats are using racial rhetoric to inflame partisan feelings against the bill.

“They want this to just be about race,” Berry said.

r.g.ratcliffe@chron.com

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/front/6365320.html

A Politician Who Can Step Up

President Obama admits to making a mistake with the Daschle debacle, saying, “I consider this a mistake on my part, one that I intend to fix and correct and make sure that we’re not screwing up again,” and “So this is a mistake — probably not the first one I’m going to be making in this office, but what I’m absolutely committed to doing is fixing it.”

I admire a man, President or not, who can admit when he fucks up. Will he get that admiration from the people who want him to fail? Doubtful. And while I’m on the topic, what kind of American wishes for the President to fail? It’s one thing to expect it; it’s quite another to hope for it.

Secondly, check out this four-month-old article about ACORN. Looks like maybe that was all so much blown smoke, too. But then, it is the IHT, which is SUCH the mouthpiece for the entire liberal agena.

http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/10/18/america/Fraud-or-Foolishness.php

And that’s about all. After over six years, I’m starting to get a little tired of blogging. Maybe I’ll get reinterested one of these days.

Secret Service Protection

I was going to post on this, but my friend Paul did it so eloquently–and I am so lazy–that I decided to just quote his entry. His amazing blog, what you can see of it, can be found here. Paul is a libertarian-with-a-lowercase-”l”. He’s also an excellent writer and a very good friend of mine. (Which means, I hope, that he won’t mind me stealing his work. )

I’m tired of the news reporting on this as if someone was intentionally aiming to slight George W. Bush. Yes, he will be the first former US President who will not receive lifetime Secret Service protection — his and Laura’s protection will only last ten years. But just so you know… the Former Presidents Act was passed in 1996 by a Republican Congress, and took effect beginning with the next newly elected president. Bill Clinton was first elected in 1993, so he and Hillary will have lifetime protection.

And this is someone who thinks the media is liberally biased…